Find Real Estate Agents and Homes for Sale


Real Estate News --> New Hampshire News

My Turn: With lead law, state isn’t stepping up to the plate


and will be a travesty for New Hampshire’s real estate industry and housing market. The House version of SB 247 will: In 2015, 59 children measured at or above the 10 ug/dl (micrograms per deciliter) action level while 548 measured from 5 to 10 ug/dl ...


Archived Story

To the N.HSenate and the Governor: There has been recent press from legislators saying it’s time we stepped up to the plate regarding lead levels in childrenUnfortunately, in the latest version of Senate Bill 247 the House of Representatives has thrown away the Senate’s work doing just that.The previous lead commission of 2008 clearly articulated that the lead issue is huge and requires all stakeholders on all sides to actively participate in its solutionLead is a societal issue that has been dumped onto us by the government and previous (and current) players in the paint and lead industry.In a show of insight and wisdom, the version of the bill passed by the Senate in 2017 was in agreement with the stakeholders from each side, who over the course of more than two years sought an equitable solution to New Hampshire’s lead issueThe lead commission, the Senate policy committee, the full Senate, the House policy committee and originally the entire House created a desperately needed grant program to aid in funding proactive primary preventive lead remediationNew Hampshire had finally “stepped up to the plate.”The current House version of the bill has negated the balance in the original bill, and will be a travesty for New Hampshire’s real estate industry and housing market.The House version of SB 247 will: – Significantly increase rents to cover the cost of thousands more abatement orders – Make housing less affordable – Create more foreclosures with less housing available – Create a huge reduction in rental property value for all of New Hampshire’s “old” housing stock.Some numbersIn 2015, 59 children measured at or above the 10 ug/dl (micrograms per deciliter) action level while 548 measured from 5 to 10 ug/dl, the new action level in the House version of bill.With the lower action level, if those additional 548 are in a four-family building that would result in 2,192 additional units requiring abatement (548 x 4 = 2,192)In the city of Claremont’s voluntary increased lead testing effort, a higher amount of testing has resulted in the same or higher percentage of children with elevated levels.Therefore it is easy math to project that with the increased testing from 16 percent to 85 percent (expected increase due to the universal testing provisions of the bill), then 2,192 becomes at least 11,645, (2,192/16 x 85 =11,645)If half of those units don’t have children or pregnant women, it is still 5,822, (11,645/2 = 5,822) additional units per year under abatement orderRemembering that the common areas, exterior and grounds would still need to be abated, the average cost of $10,000 to $20,000 per unit will be toward the higher rangeEven at only $15,000 per unit, that is $87.33 million (5,822 x $15,000 = $87.33 million) every year coming out of the real estate marketAny guesses what devastating effects that will bring?And we well know that the property is sometimes not the source of the lead elevation, yet the state still mandates the abatement using the most expensive methods available.The loan fund that has been talked about is practically of no useFirst off, it is not a loan fundThe state is only offering a guarantee for a loan that banks would likely not makeA banking lobbyist working with this bill has said banks would not likely make the loan because it would be a second or third mortgage position, and the debt-to-income ratio would likely be too far offAlso, if there is a lead order then the property would be too risky for a loan anyway.The banking industry thinks the loan guarantee will have limited useBankers are unsure of what protections they will receive from the state and what the state expects from them for collection effortsBankers also feel that the state should have some skin in the game.The grant program, on the other hand, would address these concerns and fall in line with other states offering tax credits against income tax for lead remediation.I urge our legislators to bring back the original grant program and make the state of New Hampshire one of the players with “skin in the game.”(Nick Norman is government affairs chairman for the Apartment Association of New HampshireHe also manages residential rentals in Manchester and Derry, and is a member of several state landlord associations.) var embedlocation = (0 - 1 ); $( document ).ready(function() { $("#webembedinline").insertAfter("#articlebody p:eq( "+embedlocation+" )"); }); var embedlocation2 = (0 - 1 ); $( document ).ready(function() { $("#webembedinline2").insertAfter("#articlebody p:eq( "+embedlocation2+" )"); }); Sports/College UNH hockey notebook: Japanese freshman forward Kohei Sato’s getting up to speed; Maine preview Sports/High-School High schools: Stevens, Cormier lead Laconia girls’ hoops past Belmont Sports/Professional Bergeron scores 3 as Bruins beat Islanders, 5-2, for point in 15th straight game Sports/Professional All eyes on Brady as he misses practice with hand injury window._taboola = window._taboola || []; _taboola.push({ mode: 'thumbnails-a', container: 'taboola-below-article-thumbnails', placement: 'Below Article Thumbnails', target_type: 'mix' }); Editor's Picks Most Voted Most Read Squam Lake ice harvest ‘a wonderful thing and a horrible thing’ In the food service industry, sexual harassment is ‘the norm’ Medical examiner’s office faces work overload amid opioid crisis Old mill reborn into workforce-housing apartments in Franklin Two supervised visitation centers lose funding, prepare to close  Letter: Drugs in the library Orfao: Bruins’ surge returns team to NHL relevance Letter: Time to clean house in Bow letter: A misuse of taxpayer money Robert Azzi: Now we know what Trump truly believes var rm_FeaturedJobWidgetId = 6977; $(window).load(function() { // The slider being synced must be initialized first $('#carousel').flexslider({ animation: "slide", controlNav: false, animationLoop: false, slideshow: false, itemWidth: 210, itemMargin: 5, asNavFor: '#slider' }); $('#slider').flexslider({ animation: "slide", controlNav: false, animationLoop: false, slideshow: false, sync: "#carousel", smoothHeight: true }); }); Concord Monitor Office 1 Monitor Drive Concord,NH 03301 603-224-5301

Trending New Hampshire News:


  • Jon Huntsman looks to pull a 'Rick Santorum' in New Hampshire
  • Mojo Selling Solutions, LLC Releases Its New Mojo on the Go! Application
  • Ex-advisor accused of bilking client of $1.9M changes plea, claims innocence
  • Dover attorneys represent sellers of Bank of NH Pavilion
  • Adrian J. Culveyhouse Jr.
  • Sununu supports bill that would help first-time homeowners
  • Families take ownership of homes
  • New Hampshire mayors talk up Clinton ahead of campaign visit
  • New Hampshire Business Newsmakers
  • With low inventory, high demand, home prices continue to rise in NH
  • Trump needs to show his real estate guts in the White House
  • University plans student-athlete support center
  • Coldwell holds event to kick off spring, recognize workers
  • USDA survey says NH farmland value up 3.4%
  • Documents show man could get $7M from slain grandfather
  • Trump won't renew 'Apprentice' so that he might focus on a presidential run
  • Trump in New Hampshire as he eyes presidential bid _ again
  • Historic Theater’s Marquee To Be Restored
  • New Hampshire 'ballot selfie' ban unconstitutional: appeals court
  • Missing New Hampshire teen home after 9 months