Find Real Estate Agents and Homes for Sale


Real Estate News --> Virginia News

Virginia Offers Guidance For Confirming That Medical Verifications For Emotional Support Animals Are Legitimate


To that end, the Virginia Real Estate Board and Fair Housing Board issued a Guidance Document evaluating Reasonable Accommodation Requests for Assistance Animals. Addressing the reliable medical verification concern, the guidance provides that professional ...


Archived Story

It is clear that just about all (if not all) of the federal, state, and local fair housing agencies are dealing with the exponential growth of online medical verifications for emotional support animals (ESA’s)I have addressed any number of ESA issues in this spaceProfessional apartment management companies continue to look for the appropriate sweet spot of ensuring that everyone with a legitimate disability is granted the accommodation they need, while at the same time raising appropriate questions about medical verifications that appear to have been purchased online after a few clicks of a computer mouse (or now just on a smart phone) and a $69.99 charge on a credit card (or perhaps $125 if you need the letter overnight). Many of my clients now seek supplemental information whey they receive what appear to be the online ESA form lettersI have a drawer full of the same letter, signed by some of the same online providersIn return, I get nasty grams from the online providers concluding my clients are violating the fair housing laws because they did not simply accept their verification as presentedI don’t mind taking the heat, but it is always good when a governmental entity blesses our efforts to confirm that medical verifications are legitimate. To that end, the Virginia Real Estate Board and Fair Housing Board issued a Guidance Document evaluating Reasonable Accommodation Requests for Assistance AnimalsAddressing the reliable medical verification concern, the guidance provides that professional apartment management “should not be daunted by the prospect of potential litigation into accepting dubious verifications limited to vague statements of how an assistance animal would benefit the requester, but rather should insist on supplemental credible confirmation of [an] underlying disabilityAs with any other reasonable accommodation request, housing providers are absolutely within their rights to focus first on establishing the legitimacy of the requesting party’s disability status as defined by fair housing law.” That is all we want. The Guidance further confirms that housing providers “may request that verifiers authenticate all or some of the following information to help evaluate their reliability and knowledge of the requester’s disability.” As such, I continue to believe we are well within our rights to continue to seek information concerning the: *General location of where the care was provided as well as the duration of the care (such as the number of in-person sessions within the preceding year); *Whether the verifier is accountable to or subject to any regulatory body or professional entity for acts of misconduct; *Whether the verifier is trained in any field or specialty related to persons with disabilities or the particular impairment cited; and/or *Whether the verifier is recognized by consumers, peers, or the public as a credible provider of therapeutic care. Will guidance like this stop the highly questionable ESA medical verifications? NoBut let’s hope our efforts to seek supplemental information when something looks like it has been purchased online continue to be validated. Just A Thought. [View source.] Send Print Report Latest PostsPerks And Tips For The Recent Medical Graduate: Telemedicine And HIPAA United States Tax Court Announces Election Of New Chief Judge Retaliation Sometimes Follows FLSA Lawsuit Filing—It Shouldn’t! Virginia Offers Guidance For Confirming That Medical Verifications For Emotional Support Animals Are Legitimate SAG-AFTRA Takes On Sexual Harassment See more » DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

Trending Virginia News:


  • Milbank Strengthens Real Estate Practice with Hire of Three-Partner Real Estate Team
  • WVU plans to buy more properties in Morgantown
  • Ask Eli: Q1 2017 Arlington Real Estate Update
  • Judge: Portsmouth embezzlers must repay $9.4M
  • School in Buena Vista embraces church's values
  • Trump looks to claw back Virginia, but Clinton confident
  • Virginia Beach's Lauren Burnham has Fantasy Suite experience on "The Bachelor"
  • Kornblau Real Estate Program
  • Montgomery County eyes hefty real estate tax jump - www.roanoke.com
  • Armada Hoffler Properties reports 3Q results
  • Study: Richmond named most dangerous city in VA
  • Trumps Eye Charlottesville For Golf Course
  • Southbank hotel sold in $24.7 million transaction
  • Real estate prices rose across Northern Virginia in April
  • Survey: Va. Farm Real Estate Value Increases
  • Once a global attraction, Virginia's Natural Bridge sold and now destined to be state park
  • Virginia ports ready for changing shipping trends
  • Washingtonian Magazine Names Stephen Carpenter-Israel One of Washington's Best Real Estate Agents
  • Cushman & Wakefield Named Leasing Agent for 1301 Virginia Drive
  • Doctor who loaned Va. gov money offered board post