Real Estate News
--> Alabama News
The cost of unconstitutional laws
The Alabama Attorney General's Office spends tens, and in some cases, hundreds of thousands of tax payer dollars every year to fight for Alabama laws the United States Federal Courts have ruled unconstitutional.
The Alabama Attorney General's Office spends tens, and in some cases, hundreds of thousands of tax payer dollars every year to fight for Alabama laws the United States Federal Courts have ruled unconstitutionalFrom abortion to immigration, Alabama laws keep pushing the envelope and pushing up the price tag for tax payers.
On March 1, 2012, protestors gathered outside the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in AtlantaInside, a three judge panel heard three hours of testimony from the Alabama Attorney General's Office and a pro-immigration group challenging the Alabama Immigration LawMonths later, the court ruled most of the law unconstitutional.
"The ultimate cost they had to pay out of pocket for attorneys fees and costs in that case because of the law was over $500,000," said Southern Poverty Law Center attorney Sam Brooke.
According Brooke, the "they" is the Alabama Attorney General's Office and that $500,000 came straight from tax payers' pockets.
"That is money coming out of the state budget," said BrookeThe attorney said he warned law makers.
"We went to the Alabama legislature when they were debating this law," said Brooke"We told them it was clear this law would be unconstitutional and we told them specifically why."
The SPLC says the Alabama legislature continues to debate and pass unconstitutional legislation each session, costing tax payers more money when the laws are challenged in court.
"There was a bill that would require people on public assistance to be drug tested," said SPLC deputy legal director David Dinielli"We already know there have been federal challenges out of state that have found those requirements to be unconstitutional."
"The same thing is clearly true with the abortion laws that they have passed in the last two sessions," said Brooke"These are clearly intended by the legislators to be a direct court challenge to Supreme Court precedentIt is clear that they're going to lose those cases."
"[The SPLC] said we know how it's going to turn outNo we don't," said Alabama State Representative Mike Ball"If I know how it's going turn out, I'm going to try to keep things constitutional."
Ball said he's aware of the tax payer dollars the state uses every year in litigation.
"Some things we stick our neck out on, and some things other states stick their neck out on," said Ball.
Ball said he doesn't believe the legislature is wasting tax payer money.
"We're asserting our rights as elected representatives of the people of Alabama and they're exerting their rights of citizens who have all these left leaning lawyers who want to challenge it," said Ball"Whether we like it or not, it is a messy process, but it's the process that we have," said Ball.
According to the SPLC, that process costs tax payers because those funds tied up in litigation could go towards other things like roads or education.
"Governor Bentley says in his state of the state address that he would like to see just a two percent increase for those teachers," said Brooke"And the legislators, including speaker Hubbard, says we don't have the money for thatWe're not going to give the teachers any raise whatsoever, just like we haven't done for the past several yearsWell, I can tell them where $500,000 could have come from."
The Alabama Attorney General's Office gave this response when contacted about the cost tax payers are on the hook for Federal Court battles
"The attorney general's office handles challenges to the constitutionality of state laws in-house with salaried staff attorneys, and there is no breakdown for costs as this is handled as part of their regular dutiesIn the case of abortion litigation, some money will be paid for expert feesIn one of the immigration cases, the state was ordered to pay $350,000 in legal fees, and the matter of legal fees in another case is in litigation."
The attorney general's office has not released the specific numbers requested.
"There's lots of things that I wish we didn't have to spend money on," said Ball.
But Ball says he doesn't see the legislature backing down because the SPLC or any other group opposes laws they pass.
"They're fighting us because their values are different," said Ball.
SPLC lawyers say they'll continue that costly fight if the legislature keeps passing unconstitutional laws while ignoring other issues.
"We have problems in our schools; we have problems in our prisonsThere is a lot of stuff that deserves attention and is just not getting it," said Dinielli.
The United States Federal Courts will hear Alabama's next controversial law in MayAlabama's Women's Health and Safety Act deals with admitting privileges for doctors and the possible closure of several abortion clinicsA trial date is set for May 19.
Trending Alabama News:
Tropical Storm Cindy: Tornado damages homes, barns in south Alabama
This is our Alabama
Sequestration could have more than $2.5 billion impact to Alabama's economy
Alabama prefers homeless youth to LGBT parents
Strong storms across central Alabama damage homes, leave one injured
'Significant damage' in Alabama after storms hit Southeast
Former Dothan mayor Alfred Saliba dies at age 82
2567 Alabama Ave S
Alabama Power, Signature Homes to develop new smart neighborhood
Oneonta wildfire jumps containment lines, approaching homes
Bronner Still Pushing for Medicaid Expansion
What to expect in 2018's Birmingham real estate scene
Burr & Forman Adds Atlanta-Based Real Estate Partner
Bham real estate firm arranges $5M sale in Alabama
Alabama cities ranked by ratio of affluent home values
Dog Foster Homes Needed!
After Hurricane Irma, FEMA estimates 25 percent of Florida Keys homes are gone
Alabama port to be connected to Tennessee
Birmingham PD investigates after child accidentally shoots himself
How do Alabama lakes stack up?