Find Real Estate Agents and Homes for Sale

Real Estate News --> Kentucky News

SCOTUS Reverses KY Nursing Home Arbitration Decision; Refuses To Prioritize Right To Jury Trial

The Kentucky decision can be summarized easily. The case involved nursing homes attempting to compel arbitration of wrongful death and personal injury claims by estates of deceased residents. In each case, a relative with power of attorney had signed an ...

Archived Story

Just as I predicted, SCOTUS reversed the Kentucky Supreme Court’s decision in Kindred this morning.  The interesting piece, though, is that the seven member majority went out of its way to cut off some of the “on trend” methods that state courts have been using to avoid arbitration clauses. The Kentucky decision can be summarized easily.  The case  involved nursing homes attempting to compel arbitration of wrongful death and personal injury claims by estates of deceased residents.  In each case, a relative with power of attorney had signed an admission document that included arbitration when the resident entered the nursing home.  However, the Kentucky court refused to infer the agent’s “authority to waive his principal’s constitutional right to access the courts and to trial by jury” unless that power is “unambiguously expressed” in the power-of -attorney document.  (You may recall this is the decision that analogized entering into an arbitration agreement to: putting a child up for adoption, aborting a pregnancy, and entering into personal servitude.  If that doesn’t cry out “judicial hostility to arbitration,” I don’t know what does.) Justice Kagan, writing for the seven-member majority, found Kentucky’s “clear statement rule” preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act.  “[T]he court did exactly what Concepcion barred: adopt a legal rule hinging on the primary characteristic of an arbitration agreement–namely, a waiver of the right to go to court and receive a jury trial.”  In response to Kentucky’s attempt to paint its rule as broader than arbitration, the Court said “No Kentucky court, so far as we know, has ever before demanded that a power of attorney explicitly confer authority to enter into contracts implicating constitutional guarantees.” That preemption aspect of the decision seems to confirm what I have been saying about the impact of DirecTV: states are in much better position to defend their anti-arbitration “general contract rule” if they can point to at least one non-arbitration circumstance in which it has been applied.  (The decision added a footnote to clarify this isn’t an absolute necessity: “We do not suggest that a state court is precluded from announcing a new, generally applicable rule of law in an arbitration case.” But that’s like saying it is conceivable that your mother will appreciate a new vacuum for mothers day, but we don’t recommend it.) The Court’s decision to clearly state that courts cannot invalidate arbitration agreements based on their (necessary) waiver of the right to a jury trial also cuts off a trendy argument in state courts.  New Jersey courts, for example, have invalidated arbitration agreements in recent years based on their failure to clearly advise consumers they are waiving their rights to jury trials (SCOTUS denied cert in the key NJ case, Atalese.)  Those NJ decisions are now shaky precedent, IMHO. The decision then went beyond the basic preemption analysis.  Respondents had argued the FAA had no application to contract formation, that only state law controlled that question.  SCOTUS quickly disabused the respondents, and all state courts, of that notion, reasoning that the purpose of the FAA would be completely undercut by the rule: “If the respondents were right, States could just as easily declare everyone incompetent to sign arbitration agreements.  (That rule too would address only formation.)” In doing so, the Court cut off another avenue for avoiding the FAA.  (In my view, though, the slippery slope argument relied on by SCOTUS also cuts against the formation/validity  distinction used to separate which issues are decided in court and which by arbitrators.) [As usual, Justice Thomas dissented based on his position that the FAA does not apply in state courts.] Send Print Report Related Posts SCOTUS Accepts Review of Kentucky Nursing Home Arbitration Case Latest PostsSCOTUS Reverses KY Nursing Home Arbitration Decision; Refuses To Prioritize Right To Jury Trial Maryland’s Highest Court Finds Small Claims Court Action Waived Right To Arbitrate Fifth Circuit Dances On Head of Arbitration Pin 8th Circuit Finds ADEA Does Not Preclude Arbitration See more » DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

Trending Kentucky News:

  • The WPA Builds: Swampton School, Magoffin County, Kentucky
  • Kentucky at last gets widened
  • UPDATE: Crews battle 25+ acre brush fire in Lawrence County, Ky.
  • Kentucky base may lose 2,400 soldiers
  • Our Opinion: Increase won't put school tax out of line
  • Kentucky Shakespeare Taking MacBeth to 18 Louisville Area Parks
  • IPA sells medical office building in Kentucky for more than $10 million
  • Kentucky and Mississippi to Hold Special Elections
  • New coalition to tackle Kentucky’s ‘smoking crisis’
  • How Krispy Kreme Doughnuts Found Its Sweet Spot
  • Starwood to Bring Aloft to Kentucky - Analyst Blog
  • Southern Fires Rage With 41.6 Million Now Living in Drought
  • Coxs Creek, KY Homes For Sale & Real Estate
  • Wildfire battles continue in Kentucky
  • Paducah, KY woman dies in crash in Marion, IL
  • During Fix a Leak Week, Kentucky American Water reminding customers that each drop adds up
  • Vacant houses to be sold: Organization getting homes off tax sale list
  • Steps to Take before an Appraiser's Visit
  • Old Kentucky strip mine could become solar farm
  • Kentucky primary election 2016: Clinton vs Sanders exit poll results, delegate count and all you need to know